Wal-Mart is also a big negative here. Though it benefits American’s consumers in the short run by selling low priced goods, with jobs being outsourced by suppliers in order to maintain Wal-Mart’s status quo of keeping low prices (otherwise Wal-Mart won’t put their product on it’s selves) American’s are losing potential jobs. In the long run this job loss will shrink Wal-Mart's own revenues (in America at least) because no matter how cheap the merchandise, if you don't have an income stream you won't pay for it.
POINT 6:
The U.S. government passed a law called the “Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)” in the 1970’s. As a result of this law the idea of “social security” has been removed from the U.S. economy. Under the old law a person would work for a company (usually for life since the pay standards of old jobs where much higher, thus, workers didn’t have to frequently change careers to make ends meet) retire and expect to be taken care of by the company through pension which the company was required to set aside for it’s aging workers till death or till the company itself went bankrupt. Under the ERISA law a company is only required to meet a certain percentage of the savings a worker sets aside THEMSELVES each month in a company 401K, etc… And if the worker doesn’t set aside anything then the company is free from obligation to a large degree too. Robert T. Kiyosaki calls this a shift from “defined benefit” (DB) to “defined contribution” (DC).
POINT 7:
It gets UGLIER. The MAJORITY of such company funded plans (401K’s etc…) are tied up to STOCK MARKET INDEXES! In other words, if a worker has $400,000 saved up in their company’s 401K and the market goes up 50%, GREAT! And most of the time the capital gains are “tax DEFFERED” (NOT tax free).
HOWEVER, if the market goes DOWN 50% (as has happened after the bursting of the Dotcom bubble in 2000) then that $400,000 worth of savings and contributions by the worker and the company becomes $200,000!
And this HAS HAPPENED to several MILLIONS of people in the early 2000’s.
POINT 8:
The first of the aging Baby Boomer population (which has a roughly 19 year span – from the eldest baby boomers to the youngest) will hit age 65 – “retirement age” – beginning in year 2010. This is a population of about 78 million in the U.S. alone (not including Canada and other WW2 countries). And though they are estimated to have a $2.5 trillion per year spending power (which is expected to grow to $3.0 trillion by year 2007) it will be very difficult for them to retire since most of their wealth is tied to paper assets like stocks and hard assets like real estate. So though they have roughly $32,000 - $38,400 of spending power per person per year who will buy all those assets from them when they start pulling funds out of the market and real estate?
POINT 9:This brings us to the next point, REAL ESTATE. After the Dotcom bubble burst most of the proceeds went into housing. This created the biggest bubble the residential housing market has ever seen in U.S. history after the first housing crash in 1995! Ten years later, up until the summer of 2005 at least, everyone was flipping condos and getting rich. Now, though the bubble hasn’t burst, it’s flattened out and will deflate slowly AT FIRST. But come year 2010 when the U.S. economy will go into a tailspin with Baby Boomers cashing out an all, the burst WILL happen – especially in the more overbought / overvalued areas like California.
POINT 10:The U.S. WON’T win the “War On Terror” as the Bush Administration promises because terrorism is cheap. Robert Kiyosaki says, “you don’t need an MBA degree to be a terrorist” – and it’s true. All you need is the feeling of being angry at the world and with the crisis the U.S. economy is in and the troubled times ahead “domestic terrorism” (bad term, but I guess I’m the first to coin it) will increase more than threats from overseas. People riot and rally when they’re unhappy (hey that rhymes). And they’ll have PLENTY of reason to be unhappy with the U.S. government and the U.S. economy in the decade ahead.
POINT 11: U.S. dependence on oil from the OPEC (Oil and Petroleum Exporting Countries) is greater than every before. Now with China’s oil consumption going through the roof since it’s economy is booming things are getting scary. If even 10% of it’s 1.3 billion population starts looking for cars to drive it’ll put a damper on the ALREADY LIMITED supply while the demand keeps going up and up!
Gas prices will continue to rise after year 2010 (though before that they’re expected to come back down to $40/barrel). Harry S. Dent believes so, and I agree.
POINT 12:
The Fed and media keep telling half-truths to Americans that GDP is great, unemployment is low (5%), inflation is low, consumer debt is manageable, and the national debt “can be managed if we do something quickly”.
Actually, the truth is that it’s more like “we can’t do jack now!” The situation IS, in fact, “damage beyond repair”.
GDP is a flawed economic indicator. The reason is because most of the time people (who care – as most people could give a damn since they have to get back to watching the twentieth re-run of “Friends” instead) only look at the RESULTING GDP figure rather than breaking it back down into separate parts and examining each part individually.
The individual parts which make up GDP are:
(1) Consumption
(2) Business Investment
(3) Government Spending (Federal Budget a.k.a. National Debt)
(4) Exports
(5) Imports
The GDP equation is:
(1) + (2) + (3) + (4) – (5) = Gross Domestic Product
The Fed also uses other deceiving measures like “consumer confidence” which is only a monthly survey of 5,000 U.S. homes regarding their (consumer) optimism about current and future economic conditions. Such measures GREATLY MASK reality because for one thing it doesn’t make sense to go by the opinion of a measly 5,000 out of a population of about 300 million. And secondly, I’m willing to bet most of those surveyed don’t themselves know the truth underlying the U.S. economy. If they can buy an iPod, High Definition LCD TV and finance a new car OF COURSE they’ll say “we’re confident in the U.S. economy!”
Who Will Suffer The Most?Not the wealthy, since they already have this info and are acting on it. But rather (as usual) the middle, working class (blue-collar) population. And it makes up a mighty large % of the total North American population.
The rich get richer... Again.
POINT 13:The U.S. dollar was taken off the "Gold Standard" back in 1971 by President Nixon. As a result the paper money (and even plastic cards, etc...) we are accustomed to currently are not backed by solid asset reserves (like gold). The money supply in circulation now has become a "fait money" system -
Money that a government has declared to be legal tender, despite the fact that it has no
intrinsic value and is not backed by reserves.
This means the U.S. (and even Canadian) dollar is only good as long as people continue to believe in the North American economy. When the story starts to die, so will the dollar, and inflation will accelerate.
The FED economists argue that in such a scenario market forces will emerge where the US dollar will actually "gain" leverage because it's reduced buying power will cause foreign businesses to want to open up shop here as they would have to pay less to the workers in relation to what they would have to pay workers in their own currency back home. This arguement does not, however, display the entire picture.
POINT 14.
The aging baby-boomers will be the largest "beneficiaries", or "consumers" if you will, of heath care services in the future. At the time of this writing it is estimated that these needs could amount to $78 TRILLION in their remaining lifetimes after retirement age, and most of these boomers will be dependent on things like medicare and other health and social programs which may exist or which would likely be created in the future. This imposes a heavier burden on the U.S. Gov't. While $78 trillion is nothing to sneeze at, it's important to break down this massive price tag into appropriate divisions to understand where the most pressure from this future liablity will be felt, and how it will trickle into the U.S. (and North American economy).
Insurance Companies:
These big boys' floats - espeically life insurers - will be in serious jeopardy which, of course, is not a foreign concept in the insurance business, but perhaps nothing of this magnitude (aging boomer phenomenon) has ever occured in the industry before. This could mean an onslaught of bankruptcies in the insurance world which would tricle down to the re-insurers as well. And this means that promises these companies have made would be left unfulfilled on a massive scale. Let's say of that $78 trillion roughly 50% falls on the sholders of insurers - so $39 trillion - and let's assume that 10% of these $39 trillion obligations are not met as a result of the insurers going bankrupt (this is most probablly a conservative estimate though)... That's $3.9 trillion in evaporated insurance benefits. And other compaines not forced into bankruptcy may just do what Buffett does (as a matter of being prudent) and just stop writing insurance policies. So perhaps there won't be as many "shoulders to cry on" just because everyone will be busy crying. I'm no expert on the insurance industry, but I can forsee the possiblity of some sort of negative chain reaction occuring which will ultimately affect the U.S. economy to a large extent.
Personal Health Spending Budget:
The retirement money the boomers will rely upon, while it does factor in health care costs to some degree, it is doubtful that their portfolios will be able to weather the storm ahead. Let's say, of the remaining $39 trillion, "personal health spending" amounts to roughly 40%... That's $15.6 trillion dollars, or $200K PER BOOMER in their remaining lifetimes after retirement! How can someone retire on a $1 million - $2 million portfolio after factoring such massive costs (with inflation adjusted dollars, mind you)??? And these are just health care costs. It is estimated that around 75 percent of baby boomers will require some form of home care, says Health Insurance Association of America. On the average, $50,000 - $60,000 is required annually to keep a patient in a nursing home. So $55,000 * 13 years (average life expectancy = 78 years AND RISING) = $715,000! And this does not include expenses as vacationing, recreation, and the FEELING of retirement. If boomers think they can retire on $18,000/year they've got another thing coming!
So from age 65 to 78, is 13 years of health care costs. Even a modest $10,000 per year from a boomer's bank balance amounts to $130,000 in that 13 year period... And what happens if God Almighty had predecided for that person to live till 100??? That's decades of living, but living in PAIN and SUFFERING when the porfolio dries up!
Government Spending on Health Care:
The U.S. Gov't can't let it's aging citizens suffer misery without at least "promising" them some future assistance. And while not fulfilling such promises would be politically incorrect for the Gov't I suspect the Whitehouse will have no meaningful alternative. For example, how is the remaining $15.6 trillion supposed to fall on the shoulders of the Gov't when the Gov't can't even meet it's OWN expenses and runs a budget deficit every year? Obviously the Federal folks can't manage the country's budget, so how would they manage an even tighter budget in the future? On top of this Uncle Sam will be all to glad to tax these same folks at, perhaps, alarming rates in the future. Don't forget that these IRA's, pension plans, 401K's, etc... are NOT "tax free", but rather "tax deffered". And yes, there IS such a thing as a "Death Tax".
Factor In Everyone Else:
Don't forget, I'm being modest with these projections because the baby boomer popluation is obviously not the only demographic popluation residing in North America... What about their parents? And even their own kids to some degree? Granted that young adults don't need as much health care coverage as older folks, but sickness doesn't come with a warning. Therefore, everyone is a potential candidate for health care, but not everyone will get it. And if an epidemic struck in such depressed times in the future (hey, when things are bad they usually get worse before getting better) then forget about the North American economy for a very long time.
I'll add more points to this list as I come by them.